Uncover the Most and Least Happiest Areas to Live in England in 2024: A Deep Dive into England Happiness Index!

Choosing a place to live isn't just about finding a house. It's about discovering a community that supports your well-being.

Studies have shown that convenient communication, strong economies, high safety ratings, and a healthy environment significantly influence resident satisfaction. Areas that excel in these areas tend to rank higher in happiness and quality of life. Conversely, those lacking in these aspects are likely to struggle to meet residents' needs.

The purpose of this article is to use these criteria to identify the most and least happy places to live in the England in 2024.

To this end, we've analysed five key indicators: economic performance, environment, health, safety, and connectivity. These indicators further contain several specific metrics ranging from access to healthcare, crime statistics, life expectancy, pollution levels, and leisure facilities. 

By examining this detailed data, we can understand the specific factors that contribute to a high quality of life and identify areas where improvements can be made.

Key Findings

  • Wokingham takes the crown as the happiest place to live in England with a final score of 79.78, followed closely by Rutland (79.34) and Buckinghamshire (79.27).
  • Blackpool comes in last on the list with a final score of 64.78, followed by Nottingham (65.14) and Hammersmith and Fulham (65.88).
  • The difference between the top and bottom scores for each indicator is 1.8 times.
  • Westminster takes the lead in connectivity (90), and Herefordshire (50) comes in last.
  • Northumberland has the best environmental score (90), while Tower Hamlets has the worst (50).
  • The economic rankings place West Berkshire (90) in first place and Middlesbrough (50) in last.
  • Harrow (90) holds the top spot for health in the rankings, with Peterborough (50) ranking last.
  • Rutland (90) leads in safety, while Westminster (50) is at the bottom.
  • Westminster has the highest connectivity score (90), and the lowest safety score (50).
  • Rutland has the highest safety score (90), and the third-lowest connectivity score (61.62).
  • Shropshire has the second-best environment score (81.98) and the second-worst connectivity score (58.13). 

Happiness Ranking Index England

20 Happiest Areas to Live in England

1. Wokingham

Wokingham, located in the South East of England, tops the list of the happiest areas to live in England, with a score of 79.782. The town ranks second on the list for economic stability (87.72) and safety (87.25), thanks to its high median pay (£21.65) and low unemployment rate (2.82%), as well as low crime and accident rates. Wokingham also scores highly in the health (81.26) metric, with a high life expectancy (83.96 years) and lower self-harm and suicide rates. 

However, Wokingham's connectivity (76.89) and environment (65.79) scores are not on par with those of other top contenders. This means access to GP services, pharmacies, and sports or leisure facilities is not so convenient. Meanwhile, air pollution and noise levels are also on the higher side. Despite the drawbacks, Wokingham remains the top choice to live in due to its strong economy, focus on safety, and accessibility to healthcare.

2. Rutland

Rutland, in the East Midlands, is England's second happiest area to live, with a score of 79.342. With exceptional safety (90) and health scores (84.87), this small but quaint county stands out for providing residents with a safe and healthy environment. Rutland's strong economic score (85.3) reflects a stable and prosperous local economy. 

The county also has a high environmental score (74.92), thanks to its picturesque landscapes and green spaces, which have low air and noise pollution. While its connectivity score (61.62) is quite poor, the third lowest on the list, Rutland's tranquil, community-focused lifestyle offers an appealing alternative to more urbanised regions.

3. Buckinghamshire

Buckinghamshire, located in the South East of England, ranks third among the happiest areas to live in England with a score of 79.272. With excellent connectivity (75.77), economy (82.03), environment (70.35), safety (85.56), and health facilities (82.65), the region provides residents with a prosperous and well-rounded lifestyle. Residents enjoy easy access to everyday essential services and reliable internet, making daily life smooth. The economy is thriving, with decent wages (average £18.54) and low unemployment. 

Buckinghamshire's clean air and quiet environment further contribute to a healthy quality of life. This is also reflected in the strong health metrics, with high life expectancy and low rates of mental health issues.

4. Bromley

Bromley in London comes in at number four on the list, scoring 78.934 overall. The area has good communication (82.75), offering residents easy access to essential services. Strong health (84.8) and economic indicators (76.89) point to a higher standard of life here. Besides, the environment (70.36) and safety (79.87) scores are also decent, making Bromley's well-rounded infrastructure and abundant opportunities a thriving and desirable place to live in the heart of London.

5. Trafford

Trafford, in the North West of England, snags fifth place with a score of 78.876. This area stands out for its top-notch connectivity (84.82), making it easy for people to get around. Trafford also has a stable economy (77.87) and a healthy environment (73.59). Adding to its appeal are impressive scores in health (77.92) and safety (80.18), highlighting the overall well-being residents experience here. Trafford's combination of opportunity, good infrastructure, and a high quality of life makes it a desirable place to call home. 

6. Central Bedfordshire

Nestled in the East of England, Central Bedfordshire secures the sixth spot with a score of 78.854. This region is a great place to live and work as evidenced by its connectivity (75.84) and economic (81.54) scores. While the environment scores moderately (69.97), residents in Central Bedfordshire enjoy high health standards (82.93) and a strong sense of safety (83.99).  

7. East Riding of Yorkshire

East Riding of Yorkshire, a picturesque expanse in the Yorkshire and the Humber region, places seventh on the list with a score of 78.81. The area has a strong economy (82.28) and pristine environment (80.11), blending prosperity with tranquillity. Health standards are impressive (74.2), and safety (84.13) is paramount here. With a solid connectivity score (73.33), East Riding of Yorkshire offers a harmonious blend of economic strength, environmental charm, and well-being.

8. West Berkshire

West Berkshire, a delightful region in the South East, ranks as the eighth happiest area in England with a score of 78.778. This region excels economically with a perfect score (90) and boasts excellent connectivity (73.54), making it an idyllic place to live and work.

Besides, the environmental quality (70.3) and health standards (74.68) are remarkable, and they contribute to the community's general well-being. And finally, an 85.37 safety score, suggests West Berkshire successfully provides a safe environment for its residents.

9. Bath and North East Somerset

Bath and North East Somerset, a charming haven in the South West, ranks ninth with a score of 78.774. Residents have excellent access to basic amenities and job opportunities, with strong connectivity (81.43) and economic performance (78.46). Besides, health standards (74.61) and safety (84.13) are noteworthy, ensuring a secure and healthy living environment. The region's environmental quality (75.24) further adds to its charm, making Bath and North East Somerset a delightful place.

10. Stockport

Stockport, a thriving borough in the North West of England, stands proud as the tenth happiest area in England with a score of 78.572. The region excels in connectivity (84.3) and economic performance (77.23), providing residents with seamless access to services and job opportunities. A healthy environment (71.16), high health standards (79.87), and a secure neighbourhood (80.3) all contribute further to the community's well-being. Stockport's balanced scores across various metrics create a harmonious and prosperous living space.

11. North Somerset

North Somerset, a picturesque locale in the South West, is placed in the eleventh spot with a score of 78.478. The region has good connectivity (76.81) and the second-highest economic score (86.64), offering residents excellent access to essential services and job opportunities. Environmental quality (77.01) and health standards (68.47) contribute to the overall well-being of the community. Safety, with a score of 83.46, ensures a secure living environment. A clean and tranquil environment (77.01), access to quality healthcare (68.47) and a secure neighbourhood (83.46) are essential for a community. This fosters an atmosphere where residents feel more at home.

12. Bracknell Forest

Bracknell Forest, an enchanting region in the South East, ranks twelfth with a score of 78.35. Despite comparatively lower environmental quality (67.2), this region makes up for it with good connectivity (78.51) and a strong economy (83.67). Health (78.19) and safety (84.18) scores are also impressive, which contribute to a balanced quality of life here.

13. Windsor and Maidenhead

Windsor and Maidenhead in the South East claim the thirteenth spot with a score of 78.324. This charming location offers easy access to services and plenty of job opportunities, as reflected by its strong connectivity (80.69) and economic performance (78.76). While the environmental quality (64.53) leans on the lower side, residents here have excellent healthcare (84.17) and a strong sense of security (83.47).

14. South Gloucestershire

With a score of 78.298, South Gloucestershire, a scenic location in the South West, comes in at fourteenth place. It's a lovely area to live in thanks to its winning combination of connectivity, economic strength, health, and safety. With excellent economic performance (85.25) and great connectivity (79.5), the area offers residents easy access to work prospects and essential services. Meanwhile, the well-being of the community is ensured thanks to its environmental quality (70.16), health standards (74.21) and safe living space (82.37). 

15. Harrow

Harrow, located in London, ranks fifteenth with a final score of 78.21. It has the highest health ratings (90) in England, with a life expectancy of 83.96 years and high life satisfaction (7.69). Residents enjoy good connectivity (84.87) and a sense of security (82.99) despite a lower economic performance (68.2), and environmental quality (64.99). 

16. Dorset

With a final score of 78.192, the South West region of Dorset comes in sixteenth place. The region is a comfortable and safe place to live owing to its quality of environment (78.84), health facilities (76.07), and security standards (86.92). Not to mention the region’s decent economic performance (78.36) and communication (70.77). 

17. Cheshire East

Cheshire East, in the North West, ranks seventeenth with a score of 77.862. With a strong economy (84.3) and lots of job prospects, the future is bright for those who live here. With a high safety score of 84.42, there is a strong sense of security in the region. The availability of services, healthcare, and everyday requirements is guaranteed by connectivity (74.07) and health standards (76.67). Despite having a somewhat low environmental quality (69.85), Cheshire East is nonetheless quite appealing overall.

18. Bexley

London's Bexley comes in at eighteenth place with a score of 77.744. Residents here benefit from excellent safety (81.64) and communication (84.66), making it easy to access services and feel secure in their surroundings. Decent health standards (79) suggest a dedication to the welfare of the residents. Despite the economy's moderate score of 74.83, job prospects are not scarce. However, the quality of the environment (68.59) is not very high.

19. Havering

Havering, also located in London, ranks nineteenth with a score of 77.74. Residents have excellent connectivity (82.21) and a strong feeling of safety (80.52). The economy here performs well (74.93), offering residents decent job prospects. Besides, the health standards are commendable (81.59), and the environmental quality, while on the lower side (69.45), provides a comfortable living space.

20. York

York, in Yorkshire and the Humber, rounds out the 20 areas among the happiest places to live in England with a score of 77.738. The area shines in economic performance (85.46) and environmental quality (79.54), offering great job opportunities and a pleasant living environment. Connectivity (80.97) and safety (81.08) are also top-notch. While health standards are on the lower side (61.64), York’s mix of economic strength, clean environment, and good connectivity and safety make it a great place to live with a high quality of life.

20 Unhappiest Areas to Live in England

1. Blackpool

Blackpool, located in the North West, is at the bottom of the list with an overall score of 64.782, making it the least happy area to live in England. It ranks high in connectivity with a score of 84.86, reflecting short distances to essential services. However, its economic score is low at 52.4, indicating challenges in job opportunities and wages. The environmental score is 67.69, suggesting the presence of moderate levels of air and noise pollution. Health is another area of concern, with the second lowest score of 54.14, pointing to issues in public health. Besides, the safety score of 64.82 indicates moderate rates of low-level and personal crime. Blackpool's overall low scores suggest a lot of room for improvement.

2. Nottingham

Nottingham, in the East Midlands, ranks second from the bottom with a score of 65.148. The region has similar stats to Blackpool in all five key metrics: excellent connectivity (83.62), but poor economic conditions (50.16), and substandard health facilities (56.12). Besides, there is also moderate air and noise pollution (environmental score: 66.55), while crime rates are low to moderate (safety score: 69.29). Nottingham's scores point to the need for improvements to enhance overall well-being.

3. Hammersmith and Fulham

Hammersmith and Fulham, in London, is in the third-lowest position with a score of 65.882. The area has a good connectivity score (87.9). The economy score of 64.7, indicates lower-than-average job facilities. The environmental score of 58.76, however, raises concerns about the presence of air pollution and noise. The health score of 60.24 reflects moderate public health conditions. Safety is also a concern, with a score of 57.81, suggesting higher crime rates.

4. Middlesbrough

Middlesbrough, located in the North East, ranks fourth from the bottom with a score of 66.164. The region has the lowest economic score (50), indicating job market struggles. Public health facilities also require improvement, as reflected in the health score (61.14). Safety could also benefit from attention, with a score of 64.25 suggesting higher crime rates.

However, the best thing about Middlesbrough is its connectivity (score: 81.51). Here, residents enjoy easy access to essential services and amenities. Besides, the environment (score: 73.92) is fairly pleasant with lower air pollution and noise levels.

5. Kensington and Chelsea

Kensington and Chelsea, in London, ranks fifth from the bottom with a score of 66.29. The borough shines in connectivity with a score of 89.34, the second highest on the list! Health is another strong point (score: 78.96), indicating great public health facilities. 

However, Kensington and Chelsea has the third lowest (51.61) environmental score, highlighting concerns about air pollution and noise levels. The economic score is also very low at 56.03, reflecting a challenging job market. Safety is another area needing attention, with a score of 55.51 (the third lowest) suggesting higher crime rates.

6. Portsmouth

Portsmouth, located in the South East, is in sixth place from the bottom with a score of 66.794. Residents enjoy easy access to essential services, as reflected in the connectivity score (85.26). And the economy shines with a strong score (71.45), indicating a stable job market.

The environmental score (55.13), however, suggests higher air and noise pollution levels. Public health facilities could benefit from investment, as reflected in the score (60.28). Besides, the safety score of 61.85, suggests crime rates are higher than average.

7. Westminster

Westminster, in London, ranks seventh from the bottom with an overall score of 67.062. The borough has a perfect connectivity score of 90. Health is another strong point, with an 80.25 rating suggesting excellent public health facilities. Besides, the economic score sits at 64.33, reflecting a moderate job market. However, a major cause for concern is environmental quality, ranking second lowest (50.73). This suggests significant issues with air and noise pollution. Safety is another concern, with the lowest score of 50, indicating high crime rates.

8. Knowsley

Knowsley, located in the North West, ranks eighth from the bottom with a score of 67.518. Residents here enjoy good access to services (connectivity score: 81.22) and a secure neighbourhood (safety score: 79.18). The environmental score sits at 67.31, suggesting moderate air and noise pollution levels, while the economic score (50.56) reveals challenges in the job market. Besides, public health facilities require investment, as reflected in the health score (59.32).

9. Birmingham

Birmingham, in the West Midlands, ranks ninth from the bottom with a score of 68.12. The job market here is challenging, as evidenced by the low economic score (52.24). Besides, air and noise pollution are moderate concerns, as indicated by the environmental score (61.51). However, the region has a strong connectivity score (82.32). And public health services are also decent, as reflected in the health score (71.38).

10. Kingston upon Hull

Kingston upon Hull, in Yorkshire and the Humber, is in the tenth spot from the bottom with a score of 68.164. Residents enjoy excellent access to services with a strong connectivity score (84.25). The economy is also stable, as reflected in a decent score (70.1). The environment has a moderate balance (70.35), suggesting air and noise pollution are not so bad. But crime rates are a concern, with a safety score on the lower side (60.12). And public health services require significant investment, as indicated by the third-lowest health score (56).

11. Sunderland

Sunderland, located in the North East, ranks eleventh from the bottom with a score of 68.518. The job market here is somewhat volatile as reflected in the economic score (61.4). Also, both the environment (63.78) and health (61.48) scores sit at the lower range, indicating areas where investment could improve overall well-being. However, residents do enjoy easy access to essential services (connectivity score: 82.04), and secure surroundings (safety score: 73.89).

12. Southwark

Southwark, in London, is in twelfth place from the bottom with a score of 68.922. Residents enjoy excellent connectivity (87.34), meaning easy access to shops, services, and amenities. Healthcare is another bright spot, with a score (69.84) indicating decent public health facilities. While these aspects are positive, there's room for significant improvement in other areas. The environmental score (56.81) suggests concerns with air and noise pollution. Safety is also a worry, with a low score (64.83) reflecting higher crime rates. The job market is rated as medium to low (economic score: 65.79).

13. Southampton

Southampton, in the South East, ranks thirteenth from the bottom with an overall score of 69.076. A strong connectivity score (83.93) ensures residents have easy access to services, and a moderate economic score (65.01) suggests a developing job market.

The environment (65.52) and health (63.19) scores reveal concerns with air and noise pollution, along with a need for better public health facilities. Safety (67.73) is also an area requiring attention.

14. Peterborough

Peterborough, located in the East of England, is fourteenth from the bottom with a score of 69.392. The region has the lowest health score (50), emphasising the need for investment in public health facilities. Otherwise, residents have decent access to services (connectivity score: 77.97). The environment (75.19) also scores well, suggesting low air and noise pollution levels. Besides, the economy has a decent score (71.2), indicating a stable job market. And the safety score is also good (72.6), pointing to low to average crime rates. 

15. Leicester

Leicester, in the East Midlands, ranks fifteenth from the bottom with a score of 69.554. A strong connectivity score (83.93) suggests residents have easy access to services and amenities. Public health services are also decent, as reflected in the moderate health score (71.84). Crime rates here are low to average (safety score: 72.96). However, the job market presents challenges, with a low economic score (54.32). Air and noise pollution are also a concern (environmental score: 64.72).

16. Islington

Islington, in London, ranks sixteenth from the bottom with an overall score of 69.556. The region has the third-highest connectivity score (89.24) on the list. Public health services are also commendable, as reflected in the health score (75.31). However, a major cause for concern here is the environment, with a low score (55.47) suggesting high air and noise pollution levels. Safety is another area requiring attention, with a poor score (60.53) indicating higher crime rates. The job market also faces some hurdles, as reflected in the economic score (67.23).

17. Hackney

Hackney, in London, is placed seventeenth from the bottom with an overall score of 69.842. Similar to Islington, residents here also enjoy excellent access to services and amenities with excellent connectivity (86.87). The economy also performs well (73.05), indicating a stable job market. A major drawback here also is the environment, with a low score (57.41) suggesting high air and noise pollution levels. Safety is another critical area, with the second-lowest score (54.99) pointing to high crime rates.

18. Sandwell

Sandwell, in the West Midlands, ranks eighteenth from the bottom with an overall score of 69.95. Residents enjoy good access to services with a strong connectivity score (83.84), and safety is also a positive aspect with a high score (72.78) indicating lower crime rates. Both the environment (62.36) and health (64.25) scores fall below average, highlighting areas needing investment. Air and noise pollution, along with public health facilities, could benefit from attention. The job market also presents some challenges, reflected in the moderate economic score (66.52).

19. Salford

Salford, in the North West, comes in nineteenth from the bottom with an overall score of 69.98. Residents here also enjoy easy communication (connectivity score 81.52) and lower crime rates ( safety score: 75.59).

The environment finds a moderate balance (70.79), suggesting air and noise pollution levels are not so bad. The job market, however, presents challenges, with a low economic score (59.82). Public health services also require attention, as reflected in the low health score (62.18).

20. Manchester

Manchester, located in the North West, is in 20th place from the bottom with a score of 70.03. Residents enjoy easy access to services and amenities with a strong connectivity score (83.97). The environment finds a good balance (67.46), suggesting air and noise pollution are lower than in many other places on this list. Safety scores are moderate (70.61), pointing to an average to low crime rates. The job market is difficult to navigate, with a low economic score (59.65). The average health score (68.46) reflects the need for investment in public health services.  

Connectivity: Top 5 vs Bottom 5 Areas

Top Area (Westminster) vs Bottom Area (Herefordshire): 1.8x Difference

- Westminster, in London, leads with a perfect score of 90, thanks to shorter average distances to GP services, pharmacies, and leisure facilities (0.53 km, 0.36 km, and 0.34 km, respectively), with only 0.02% of premises unable to receive 10Mbit/s internet compared to other areas. 

- Herefordshire, in the West Midlands, trails behind with a score of 50, due to the longer average distances to GP services, pharmacies, and leisure facilities (2.75 km, 4.42 km, and 1.09 km, respectively), with 4.19% of premises unable to get 10Mbit/s internet compared to other areas.

Economy: Top 5 vs Bottom 5 Areas

Top Area (West Berkshire) vs Bottom Area (Middlesbrough): 1.8x Difference

- West Berkshire, in the South East, leads with a perfect score of 90, thanks to a higher hourly average pay (£20.88); a higher (22.18%) pay increase from 2020 to 2023; a higher percentage (96.26%) of young people in sustained education or employment; and a lower unemployment rate (2.99%), compared to other areas.

- Middlesbrough, in the North East, trails behind with a score of 50, due to a lower hourly average pay (£15.13); a lower (8.46%) pay increase from 2020 to 2023; a lower percentage (88.84%) of young people in sustained education or employment; and a higher unemployment rate (7.25%), compared to other areas.

Environment: Top 5 vs Bottom 5 Areas

Top Area (Northumberland) vs Bottom Area (Tower Hamlets): 1.8x Difference

- Northumberland, in the North East, ranks first with a perfect score of 90, because of a lower air pollution rate (5.08 µg/m³); a minimal rate of noise complaints (2.64 per 1,000 people); and a low percentage (2%) of overcrowded households, compared to other areas.

- Tower Hamlets, in London, ranks last with a score of 50, owing to a higher air pollution rate (9.48 µg/m³); a higher rate of noise complaints (at 25.54 per 1,000 people); and a higher percentage (12.70%) of overcrowded households, compared to other areas.

Health: Top 5 vs Bottom 5 Areas

Top Area (Harrow) vs Bottom Area(Peterborough): 1.8x Difference

- Harrow, in London, ranks first with a perfect score of 90 because of a lower percentage (17.91%) of its population suffering from high blood pressure; a higher life expectancy of 83.96 years; a higher mean life satisfaction of 7.69, a lower number of emergency admissions for self-harm (89.16 per 100,000), and a lower number of suicides (5.4 suicides per 100,000), compared to other areas.

- Peterborough, in East of England, ranks at the bottom with a score of 50, owing to a higher percentage (56.85%) of people suffering from high blood pressure; a lower life expectancy (80.55 years); a lower mean life satisfaction (7.27); and a higher suicide rate (11.2 per 100,000 people), compared to other areas.

Safety: Top 5 vs Bottom 5 Areas

Top Area (Rutland) vs Bottom Area(Westminster): 1.8x Difference

- Rutland, in the East Midlands, ranks first with a perfect score of 90, thanks to lower rates of low-level and personal crimes (1.51 and 23.57 per 1,000 people); and minimal number (0.11 per km²) of road crashes reported compared to other areas.

- Westminster, London, ranks last with a score of 50, due to higher rates of low-level and personal crimes (12.54 and 75.83 per 1,000 people); and a higher number (53.25 per km²) of road crashes reported compared to other areas.

Conclusion‍

This analysis clearly shows that there is a strong connection between resident satisfaction and key factors like economy, safety, and environment. While some areas shine in these areas, others face challenges.

This data isn't just informative, it's empowering. By understanding the specific metrics that contribute to happiness, communities can identify areas for improvement. Investing in economic growth initiatives, environmental clean-up, and public safety measures can significantly elevate a region's overall ranking and create a more attractive and fulfilling place to live.

Methodology

This report outlines the methodology used to rank the happiest counties in England from 123 counties. We considered five key categories that contribute to a happy county :

  • Health : This category focuses on factors impacting the physical and mental well-being of residents.
  • Economy : This category focuses on factors that influence the financial stability and economical situation of the county.
  • Safety : This category focuses on factors that impact the overall security and well-being of residents.
  • Connectivity : This category focuses on factors that influence the ease and efficiency of transportation and communication for residents.
  • Environment : This category focuses on factors that impact the natural surroundings and overall environmental quality for residents

Data Acquisition and Normalization

We compiled data from various sources relevant to each category. To ensure a fair comparison across all states, we employed a normalization technique. This process transformed the data points within each category to a common scale (40, 100) while preserving the relative differences between them.

Scoring and Weighting

For each category, we identified specific metrics that contribute to its overall score. Each metric was assigned a weight reflecting its relative importance in determining the happiest county. For example: Health category might prioritize factors like life expectancy with a higher weight compared to percentage of people with high blood pressure.
Weights are subjected for the assessment and should be treated as such.

Calculating the Final Score

  • We first calculated a score for each category by:some text
    • Normalizing the individual data points within the category.
    • Multiplying each normalized value by its corresponding weight.
    • Summing the weighted values.
  • We then further normalized the category scores themself (50 to 90) to create a final score for each county. This final score represents a composite measure of a countie’s overall happiness factor.
  • Ranking based on this final score

Data Sources

  • Percentage of people suffering from High Blood pressure (2021) : ONS
  • Life Expectancy (2021) : ONS
  • Mean Life satisfaction (2021) : ONS
  • The number of first finished emergency admission episodes in patients, with a recording of self-harm per 100,000 (2021) : ONS
  • Percentage of people with mental health conditions (2021) : ONS
  • Number of Suicides per 100,000 (2021) : ONS
  • Median Distance to General Practitioner services in km (2021) : ONS
  • Median Distance to pharmacies in km (2021) : ONS
  • Median Distance to sports or leisure facilities in km (2021) : ONS
  • Percentage of Premises Unable to Receive 10Mbit/s internet (2021) : ONS
  • Air pollution rate (Population-weighted annual mean PM2.5 in µg m-3) (2021) : ONS
  • Crude Rate of Noise Complaints per 1000 person (2021) : ONS
  • Percentage of Overcrowded Household (2021) : ONS
  • Low Level Crime per 1000 persons (2021) : ONS
  • Personal crimes per 1000 (2021) : ONS
  • Road accidents per km^2 (2021) : ONS
  • Total reported Injuries in workplace per 100,000 (2021) : ONS
  • Percentage of young people in sustained education, employment or apprenticeships (2021) : ONS
  • Unemployment Rate (2021) : ONS
  • Gross Hourly Median Pay (2023) : NOMIS
  • Gross Hourly Median Pay Increase Percentage (2020 - 2023) : NOMIS
  • Rent to Wage Ratio : ONS , ONS


Methodology: Further Details‍